Overview
Both corals can display flowing tentacles and similar color palettes, which is why many store photos blur the distinction.
The most useful difference is tentacle tip shape: hammer tips look more anchor-like or flattened, while frogspawn tips split into multiple rounded lobes.
Branch structure and polyp spacing provide secondary clues that become clearer as colonies mature.
Key traits to review
- Tentacle tip profile: anchor/hammer ends vs split bubble-like ends.
- Branch architecture: compact branch spacing vs longer segmented extension.
- Flow behavior: how consistently tentacle tips retain their shape under movement.
- Colony texture: visual density and how polyps cluster around each branch.
Common confusion points
- Young frags may not show mature tip shapes, especially in store grow-out systems.
- Heavy flow can distort the visible tip and make both corals look similar in motion.
- Color names such as gold, green, or rainbow are not reliable identifiers.
- Vendor labels sometimes prioritize trade naming over strict morphology.
Beginner tips
- Pause flow briefly before taking ID photos so tentacle tips are easier to read.
- Compare your coral to several reference images from the same growth stage.
- Track shape changes over a month rather than relying on one photo session.
- If clues conflict, classify it conservatively as Euphyllia/Fimbriaphyllia group first.
When AI identification helps
- When you want a likely first-pass guess between two close LPS options.
- When reviewing frag photos before purchase and deciding what to ask the seller.
- When building a personal tank record and checking if identification stays consistent over time.
Use AI outputs as a practical starting point. For final confidence, compare against morphology over time and experienced reef references.
Try Coral Identifier on your own tank photos
Capture a clear photo, review likely matches, and build better coral ID confidence over time.